4.7 Article

A mathematical model for flame volume estimation based on flame height of turbulent gaseous fuel jet

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 103, Issue -, Pages 276-283

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.06.061

Keywords

Turbulent buoyant jet diffusion flame; Flame volume; Flame shape; Sub-atmospheric pressure; Mathematical model

Funding

  1. Excellent Young Scientist Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51422606]
  2. Newton Advanced Fellowship [NSFC: 51561130158, RS: NA140102]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB719702]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. State Key Laboratory of Fire Science (SKLFS) [HZ2015-KF08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the flame shape and flame volume of turbulent gaseous fuel jets. Experiments are conducted for turbulent gaseous fuel jet flames produced by nozzles with different diameters of 4, 5, 6 and 8 mm using propane as fuel in both normal-(Hefei city: 100 kPa) and a sub-atmospheric pressure (Lhasa city: 64 kPa). The predicted flame shape outlines by the classic Baron's model are compared with the experimental results obtained by the Orloff's image analysis method. It is shown that Baron's method can well predict the width as well as the shape of the flame, although the predicted flame widths are slightly larger than the experimental results at the bottom and top part of the flame. Then, a mathematical model for the flame volume estimation is deduced by the integration of the Baron's expression, to provide an explicit and easily applied model to calculate the flame volume based on just the flame height. The proposed model is shown to fairly well predict the flame volume in both pressures although the predictions are a bit larger than the experimental values. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available