Journal
HISTORY AND THEORY
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages 349-370Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/hith.12069
Keywords
science; Emerson; Nietzsche; Burckhardt; Hegel; nineteenth century
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Contained mostly within one brief chapter of his The World as Will and Representation, Schopenhauer's philosophy of history has long been considered either hostile or irrelevant to nineteenth-century philosophy of history. This article argues that, on the contrary, Schopenhauer maintained what would become a widely accepted criticism of the methodological identity of historiography and the natural sciences. His criticism of Hegel's teleological historiography was more philosophically rigorous than is commonly acknowledged. And his proposal of a genuine historiography along the model of art became a major influence on the historiography of Burckhardt, Emerson, and Nietzsche. This article accordingly aims to restore Schopenhauer to the conversation of nineteenth-century philosophy of history.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available