3.8 Review

Ocular changes during pregnancy

Journal

JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 202-210

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.11.012

Keywords

Eye; Gestation; Ophthalmic change; Pregnancy; Visual change; Visual system

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To summarize available literature on physiologic and pathologic ocular changes during pregnancy. Methods: Narrative review of literature. Results: Ocular changes occur commonly during pregnancy. Although most of these are benign physiologic responses to the metabolic, hormonal, and immunologic modifications to adopt the gestational product, there is some serious pathology that may develop, exacerbate, or even resolve over the course of pregnancy which requires prompt diagnosis and management. The pathological eye conditions can be classified into preexisting pathologies and emerging ocular diseases. Regardless of the different mechanisms by which these ocular changes occur, the key point is the establishment of an effective perinatal screening program to monitor the new development or successive progression of these ocular abnormalities. Irrespective of the visual health status of the pregnant women, regular perinatal eye examination should be scheduled in order to assure continuous surveillance of healthy eyes. Treatment of pathologic ocular conditions or functionally disturbing benign changes relies on an appropriate patient selection. Conclusions: Discriminating pathological eye disease from physiologic ocular changes is important in order to establish an individualized treatment or preventive plan and constitutes the mainstay of obstetric ophthalmology. This individualized approach should always weigh the ocular benefits of treatment to the mother against the potential harms to the fetus. Copyright (C) 2017, Iranian Society of Ophthalmology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available