4.6 Article

Vagus nerve stimulation in pregnant rats and effects on inflammatory markers in the brainstem of neonates

Journal

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages 514-519

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/pr.2017.265

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [HD954931]
  2. NSF [MRI-DBI 0923559]
  3. Loma Linda University School of Medicine Pediatrics Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an Food and Drug Administration-approved method delivering electrical impulses for treatment of depression and epilepsy in adults. The vagus nerve innervates the majority of visceral organs and cervix, but potential impacts of VNS on the progress of pregnancy and the fetus are not well studied. METHODS: We tested the hypothesis that VNS in pregnant dams does not induce inflammatory changes in the cardiorespiratory control regions of the pups' brainstem, potentially impacting the morbidity and mortality of offspring. Pregnant dams were implanted with stimulators providing intermittent low or high frequency electrical stimulation of the subdiaphragmatic esophageal segment of the vagus nerve for 6-7 days until delivery. After birth, we collected pup brainstems that included cardio-respiratory control regions and counted the cells labeled for pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha) and high mobility group box 1. RESULTS: Neither pup viability nor number of cells labeled for pro-inflammatory cytokines in nucleus tractus solitarii or hypoglossal motor nucleus was impaired by VNS. We provide evidence suggesting that chronic VNS of pregnant mothers does not impede the progress or outcome of pregnancy. CONCLUSION: VNS does not cause preterm birth, affect wellbeing of progeny, or impact central inflammatory processes that are critical for normal cardiovascular and respiratory function in newborns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available