4.4 Article

Gender Differences in Concussion and Postinjury Cognitive Findings in an Older and Younger Pediatric Population

Journal

PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY
Volume 70, Issue -, Pages 44-49

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.02.001

Keywords

gender; concussion; cognitive testing; pediatric

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Studies have documented gender differences associated with concussion. The purpose of this study was to determine if these gender differences are also noted within a pediatric population. METHODS: This prospective study analyzed 1971 patients who had completed preconcussion and postconcussion neuropsychological testing within the Washington, DC, area. RESULTS: Our results showed that children and adolescents with concussion exhibit gender differences with respect to risk factors, recovery, and symptomatology. Females are more likely to preent with a concussion (P < 0.001), experience more discomfort from a concussion (P < 0.001),, and seek treatment for postconcussive headaches (P < 0.001). On the other hand, males are more likely to sustain a concussion from a contact sport (P < 0.001) and experience loss of consciousness, confusion, and amnesia with a concussion more frequently than females (P < 0.001). Postconcussive cognitive function also differs by gender. Both males and females exhibit a decline in cognitive testing compared with baseline (P < 0.001); however, visual memory (P = 0.02) is more affected in females than in males. These findings remain unchanged among pediatric patients aged >= 14 years; however, no gender differences were noted in individuals aged <= 13 years. CONCLUSION: It is important for health care providers, schools, athletic trainers, and coaches to be aware of these gender differences associated with concussion in order to provide adequate surveillance and appropriate monitoring and support during the recovery period.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available