4.4 Article

Contribution of symmetric dimethylarginine to GFR decline in pediatric chronic kidney disease

Journal

PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 697-704

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-017-3842-x

Keywords

Chronic kidney disease; Pediatric; Methylated arginine derivatives; SDMA; CKD progression

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R01HD074596]
  2. National Institute for Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases [UO1 DK066174]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background In pediatric chronic kidney disease (pCKD), traditional factors (proteinuria, etiology, and race) do not fully explain disease progression. The levels of methylated arginine derivatives (MADs: asymmetric and symmetric dimethylarginine, respectively) rise in CKD and increase with CKD progression. The impact of MADs on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline has not been examined in pCKD. The aim of this study was to examine the additive impact of baseline (BL) levels of MADs on directly measured GFR (mGFR) decline per year (ml/min/1.73 m(2)/year) for a period of up to 4 years. Methods Plasma and data, including mGFR by plasma iohexol clearance, were provided by the prospective, observational Chronic Kidney Disease in Children study. BL MADs were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Results For 352 pCKD subjects, the median [interquartile range] BL mGFR was 45 [35, 57] ml/min/1.73 m(2). The levels of BL MADs were inversely related to the initial mGFR and its decline over time (p < 0.0005) but not to the rate of decline. Covariates, non-glomerulopathy and Tanner stage of >= 3 demonstrated weaker relationships between BL levels and beginning mGFR (p = 0.004 and p = 0.002, respectively). Conclusions In pCKD, higher concentrations of BL MADs were inversely related to BL mGFR. MADs did not affect the CKD progression rate. Quantification of this relationship is novel to the pCKD literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available