4.7 Review

The influence of apartment location on household space heating consumption in multi-apartment buildings

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 103, Issue -, Pages 185-197

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.057

Keywords

Apartment location; Space heating consumption; Simulation programs; Location correction factor

Funding

  1. World Bank and Global Environment Facility in the framework of the Heat Reform and Building Energy Efficiency project (HRBEE)
  2. Tianjin Municipal Heating Department
  3. Tianjin eco-city green building planning design key technology integration and demonstration [2013BAJ09B01]
  4. National Technology Support Plan Project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discussed the influence of apartment location on household space heating energy demand per floor area in multi-apartment buildings. According to the actual data, apartment location has a significant impact on space heating consumption per floor area in multi-apartment buildings. Based on average data of each location, a corner unit on the top floor has a space heating consumption per floor area 26.1% higher than a center unit on the middle floor. For multi-apartment buildings, a correction should be made to reflect the effect of apartment location when billing is calculated from space heating consumption instead of floor area. Location correction factors (LCFs) of seven typical cities based on building type and building age were analyzed by calibrated simulation method. The study finds that LCFs for older buildings are smaller than those of younger buildings, varying from 0.8% to 15.3% for seven typical cities. As for different regions, the greater the heating degree day is, the larger the location correction factor (LCF) is, with the deviation among 5.7-14.4%. LCFs can provide a billing-tool to make a fair allocation of heating costs, which may promote the reform of heat metering and billing in China. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available