4.7 Article

One pot preparation of polysulfone-amino functionalized SiO2 nanoparticle ultrafiltration membranes for water purification

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages 4598-4604

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2018.06.045

Keywords

Nanocomposite membrane; One-pot; Amino functionalized SiO2; Water purification; Antifouling

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Highly hydrophilic and fouling resistant polysulfone (PSF) membranes were prepared via one pot methodology by simultaneous phase inversion and nanoparticle formation. Membrane morphology, hydrophilicity, and surface charge behavior were thoroughly characterized by scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, contact angle, and zeta potential measurements. The SiO2-NH2 nanoparticle distribution in membrane matrix was also investigated by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy. The water purification performances, some of the membranes flux, rejection, and flux recovery, were evaluated by ultrafiltration of bovine serum albumin protein, Congo red, and methylene blue dyes under dead end mode. The fouling tendency of the membrane was evaluated by bovine serum albumin protein adsorption and ultrafiltration. The properties of the prepared membranes could be tuned by varying the SiO2-NH2 concentration. The nanocomposite membranes exhibited superior water permeation, rejection, and antifouling performance as compared to neat PSF membranes. Hydrophilicity was increased due to amino functionalized SiO2 particles, leading to up to 7-fold increase in water flux and more than 93% protein rejection efficiency with PSF-APTEOS-20 and -10 membranes, respectively. Overall, this work proves an easy and straightforward method for nanocomposite ultrafiltration membrane preparation with good separation and filtration efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available