4.1 Article

Evaluation of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy After Single and Multiple Dosings of LY3016859 in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Diabetic Nephropathy

Journal

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages 759-772

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.436

Keywords

diabetic nephropathy; epiregulin; transforming growth factor alpha

Funding

  1. Eli Lilly and Company

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two phase 1 studies (TGAA and TGAB) evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of LY3016859 (LY), a monoclonal antibody that binds epiregulin and transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-alpha), administered intravenously or subcutaneously. In TGAA, 56 healthy subjects received a single dose of LY (0.1-750 mg intravenously, 50 mg subcutaneously) or placebo. In TGAB part A, 15 patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN) received 2 doses of LY (10-750 mg intravenously) or placebo, and in TGAB part B, 45 patients with DN received 5 doses of LY (50-750 mg intravenously) or placebo. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, anti-LY antibodies, and change in proteinuria and albuminuria were evaluated. Single and multiple doses of LY administered 3 weeks apart were well tolerated. Pharmacokinetics were nonlinear in healthy subjects and patients with DN, indicating target-mediated drug disposition. Epiregulin level increased in both studies, and TGF-alpha levels increased in the TGAB study, consistent with target engagement; however, LY treatment did not significantly reduce proteinuria or albuminuria in patients with DN. There was no obvious effect of LY on the disease-related biomarkers monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, synaptopodin, or transferrin. Although LY administration resulted in a high frequency of anti-LY antibodies, pharmacokinetics, target engagement, and efficacy were not impacted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available