4.7 Article

Comparative analysis of energy related performance and construction cost of the external walls in high-rise residential buildings

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages 67-74

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.03.058

Keywords

Cost analysis; Energy performance; External wall; Life cycle cost; Residential building; Value evaluation

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP) [2008-0061908]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [22A20130000108] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the design phase of a high-rise residential building, stakeholders should adopt the proper external wall system by considering energy performance and IEQ as well as construction cost and structural stability. The energy related performance and construction cost of external walls affect the life cycle cost. Therefore, also a value analysis of the LCC in terms of the energy performance is required. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the energy related performance and construction cost of external walls in high-rise residential buildings, which are the currently staple external walls, using reinforced concrete (RC), glass fiber reinforced concrete (GFRC) and cellulose fiber reinforced cement (CFRC). All the wall systems have the same doors and windows in their bodies for equal comparison of energy efficiency and construction cost. The energy efficiency of the CFRC external walls was high while the construction cost for RC external walls was low. The value assessment considering the LCC and the residents' health revealed that RC external walls were most satisfactory up to 6 years after construction, GFRC from 6 years to 26 years, and CFRC thereafter, respectively. The findings of this research will be valuable for stakeholders deciding on an external wall system. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available