4.5 Article

Adolescents with at-risk eating and lifestyle behaviors are affected by after school schedules across the clinical weight spectrum

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 100, Issue 8, Pages 1511-1518

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.03.008

Keywords

Adolescent; Obesity; Dietary intake; Health behavior; Health promotion programs

Funding

  1. Department of Human Sciences at The Ohio State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Evaluate adolescent lifestyle patterns to develop more effective health promotion programs. Methods: An interview approach was employed to gain in-depth understanding of eating and activity behaviors. Adolescents aged 13-18 years (n = 43) from clinically normal and obese weight categories were enrolled. Nutrient intake and food group servings were obtained from a food frequency questionnaire. Results: Four participant subgroups were identified and labeled: Idle, Engaged, Balanced and Working. Idle adolescents were sedentary, sometimes napped, and often snacked after dinner. Engaged adolescents participated in extra-curricular activities for the majority of their after school hours. Balanced adolescents participated in a single after-school activity followed by sedentary time; they consumed meals consistently and often snacked after dinner. Working adolescents were the least sedentary with limited sleep duration and inconsistent meals; they often substituted a meal with a snack. Weight status did not differentiate subgroups effectively. Conclusions: Each group demonstrated at-risk behaviors for obesity. Future programs should consider after-school schedules and use activity and meal pattern assessments, not simply weight status, for program tailoring. Practice implications: Pediatric health care providers could identify at-risk behaviors through routine assessment of diet and activity patterns in combination with weight monitoring. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available