4.5 Article

Validation of 34betaE12 immunoexpression in clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma as a sensitive biomarker

Journal

PATHOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 10-18

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2016.05.014

Keywords

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma; CK7 immunoreactivity; 34 beta E12; CK14 antigen expression; FISH analysis; VHL mutation; chromosome 3p deletion; aCGH; biomarker

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, Anatomic Pathology, University of Verona

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (CCPRCC) is a recently recognised neoplasm with a broad spectrum of morphological characteristics, thus representing a challenging differential diagnosis, especially with the low malignant potential multicystic renal cell neoplasms and clear cell renal cell carcinoma. We selected 14 cases of CCPRCC with a wide spectrum of morphological features diagnosed on morphology and CK7 immunoreactivity and analysed them using a panel of immunohistochemical markers, focusing on 34 beta E12 and related CKs 1,5,10 and 14 and several molecular analyses such as fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH), VHL methylation, VHL and TCEB1 sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Twelve of 13 (92%) CCPRCC tumours were positive for 34 beta E12. One tumour without 3p alteration by FISH revealed VHL mutation and 3p deletion at aCGH; thus, it was re-classified as clear cell RCC. We concluded that: (1) immunohistochemical expression of CK7 is necessary for diagnostic purposes, but may not be sufficient to identify CCPRCC, while 34 beta E12, in part due to the presence of CK14 antigen expression, can be extremely useful for the recognition of this tumour; and (2) further molecular analysis of chromosome 3p should be considered to support of CCPRCC diagnosis, when FISH analysis does not evidence the common loss of chromosome 3p.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available