4.4 Article

Overexpression of the Transmembrane Protein IQGAP3 Is Associated with Poor Survival of Patients with Gastric Cancer

Journal

PATHOBIOLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 3, Pages 192-200

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000481890

Keywords

IQGAP3; Mucin phenotype; Spheroid; Cancer stem cell; Gastric cancer

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [B-15H04713, 26670175, 16K15247]
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H06999] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Spheroid colony formation is a useful method of cancer stem cell (CSC) characterization. We previously showed that the IQ motif containing the GTPase-activating protein 3 gene (IQGAP3) is upregulated in spheroid body-forming gastric cancer (GC) cells compared with parental cells. We investigated IQGAP3 expression in GC. Methods: IQGAP3 protein expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in 165 GC cases. RNA interference was used to inhibit IQGAP3 expression in GC cell lines. Results: In nonneoplastic gastric mucosa, weak staining of IQGAP3 was observed in the foveolar epithelium, while GC tissue showed stronger, more extensive staining. Of the 165 GC cases, 34 (21%) were positive for IQGAP3 expression. GC cases positive for IQGAP3 were found more frequently in stage II/III/IV cases than in stage I cases. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that IQGAP3 expression is an independent prognostic classifier of GC patients. Both the number and size of the spheres formed by MKN-74 cells were significantly reduced by knockdown of IQGAP3. The phosphorylation of Akt and Erk1/2 was inhibited by knockdown of IQGAP3. Conclusion: These results suggest that IQGAP3 plays an important role in gastric CSCs. The location of IQGAP3 on the cell membrane makes it a potential therapeutic target for GC. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available