4.5 Article

A comparative assessment of empirical and lattice Boltzmann method-based drag models for simulation of gas-solid flow hydrodynamics in a bubbling fluidized bed

Journal

PARTICUOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue -, Pages 129-137

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2016.08.008

Keywords

CFD; Drag model; Gas-solid flow hydrodynamics; Bubbling fluidized bed

Funding

  1. Brazilian Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq) [150894/2014-7]
  2. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2013/21244-5]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [13/21244-5] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In simulations of fluidized beds using computational fluid dynamics (CFD), the description of gas-solid flow hydrodynamics relies on a drag model to account for the momentum transfer between gas and solid phases. Although several studies of drag models have been published, there have been few investigations of the application of lattice Boltzmann method (LBM)-based drag models to bubbling fluidized bed simulations. In the present study, a comprehensive comparison of empirical and LBM-based drag models was carried out to assess the performance of these models during simulations of gas-solid flow hydrodynamics in a bubbling fluidized bed. A CFD model using the MFIX code based on the Eulerian-Eulerian approach and the kinetic theory of granular flow was used to simulate a 2D bubbling fluidized bed with Geldart B particles. The simulation results were validated by comparison with experimental data. Statistical analysis of the results shows that LBM-based drag models can reliably model gas-solid flow hydrodynamics in a bubbling fluidized bed. (C) 2017 Chinese Society of Particuology and Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available