Journal
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT
Volume 48, Issue -, Pages 302-315Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.09.005
Keywords
-
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The commentary by Baillargeon, Buttelmann and Southgate raises a number of crucial issues concerning the replicability and validity of measures of false belief in infancy. Although we agree with some of their arguments, we believe that they underestimate the replication crisis in this area. In our response to their commentary, we first analyze the current empirical situation. The upshot is that, given the available evidence, it remains very much an open question whether infants possess a rich theory of mind. We then draw out more general conclusions for future collaborative studies that have the potential to address this open question.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available