4.5 Article

GCH1 mutations are common in Serbian patients with dystonia-parkinsonism: Challenging previously reported prevalence rates of DOPA-responsive dystonia

Journal

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
Volume 45, Issue -, Pages 81-84

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.09.017

Keywords

GCH1; Mutation; DOPA-responsive dystonia; Prevalence

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education and Science, Republic of Serbia [ON175090, ON175091]
  2. Hermann and Lilly Schilling Foundation
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG) Research Unit [FOR2488]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: GTP cyclohydrolase 1-deficient DOPA-responsive dystonia, caused by autosomal dominant mutation in the gene coding for GTP cyclohydrolase 1, is a rare disorder with a reported prevalence of 0.5 per million. A correct diagnosis of DRD is crucial, given that this is an exquisitely treatable neurogenetic disorder. Although genetic testing is now widely available, we hypothesize that DRD is still under diagnosed and its prevalence underestimated. Methods: Molecular genetic analysis of the GCH1 gene was performed in a representative cohort of 47 Serbian patients with clinical features of DRD and in their 16 available relatives. The DRD prevalence rate in Serbia was estimated based on population size, catchment area, and the centralized Serbian referral system for rare diseases. Results: We identified 9 different GCH1 mutations in 23 individuals from 11 families, 5 of which are novel. Patients displayed a broad range of clinical phenotypes. The estimated prevalence of GCH1-related DOPA-responsive dystonia in Serbia was 2.96 per million individuals and there was no evidence for a common founder. Conclusions: Our data expand the genotypic spectrum of GCH1 and confirm the broad phenotypic spectrum of DRD in the Serbian population. The number of detected mutation carriers in this sample implies that the frequency of DRD in the Serbian population is considerably higher than expected based on published prevalence rates, suggesting that the prevalence of this treatable disease should be revisited also in other populations. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available