4.7 Review

Low-emissivity materials for building applications: A state-of-the-art review and future research perspectives

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 96, Issue -, Pages 329-356

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.03.024

Keywords

Low-emissivity; Low-e; Building; Energy; State-of-the-art; Review

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway
  2. Lian Trevarefabrikk
  3. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) through the NTNU
  4. SINTEF research project Improved Window Technologies for Energy Efficient Buildings (EffWin)
  5. Research Centre on Zero Emission Buildings (ZEB)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low-emissivity (low-e) materials can be used in order to reduce energy usage in both opaque and transparent areas of a building. The main focus for low-e materials is to reduce the heat transfer through thermal radiation. Furthermore, low-e materials will also influence on the daylight and total solar radiation energy throughput in windows, the latter one often characterized as the solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC). This work reviews low-e materials and products found on the market, and their possible implementations and benefits when used in buildings. The SHGC is often left out by many countries in energy labellings of windows. With opaque low-e materials, research is still ongoing to correctly calculate the effect with regard to thermal performance when applied in buildings. Future research perspectives on where low-e technologies may develop are explored. To the authors' knowledge, there seems to be little available literature on how ageing affects low-e materials and products. As this is of large significance when calculating energy usage over the lifetime of a building, ageing effects of low-e materials should be addressed by manufacturers and the scientific community. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available