4.6 Article

Removal of lead(II) from aqueous solution using date seed-derived biochar: batch and column studies

Journal

APPLIED WATER SCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13201-018-0829-0

Keywords

Adsorption; Biochar; Date seed; Desorption; Isotherms; Lead

Funding

  1. higher committee for education development in Iraq (HCED)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explored the adsorption of lead ion from aqueous solution onto biochars produced from date seed biomass. Initial evaluation of nine date seed-derived biochars showed that biochar prepared at 550 degrees C and heating time of 3h (DSB550-3) was the best adsorbent for Pb2+ ion removal. Therefore, it was selected for further investigation in batch and column experiments. The effects of contact time, initial Pb2+ concentration, and solution pH were studied. Solution pH showed strong effect on the adsorption ability of DSB550-3 biochar to the lead ion, and the maximum adsorption capacity was found to occur around pH 6.0. The batch maximum adsorption capacity of DSB550-3 biochar was 0.360mmolg(-1). The equilibrium data were adequately fitted to Freundlich and Langmuir isotherms (R-2=0.97). The adsorption kinetics were best described by pseudo-second-order model (R-2=0.94). The breakthrough curve obtained from the column experiment was best described by the modified dose-response model (R-2=0.95). The desorption efficiencies of Pb2+ were 2.1%, 23%, 12%, and 55% for DI water, 0.1M HCl, 0.1M CaCl2, and a combination of 0.1M HCl+0.1M CaCl2 eluents, respectively. FTIR analysis and batch experiments results suggested that Pb2+ adsorption mechanism was dominated by complexation with active surface groups, precipitation, and cation exchange. Experimental and model results suggested that date seed-derived biochar has high adsorption capacity for Pb2+ compared to other plant-based biochars reported in other literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available