4.7 Article

Evidence for a conserved quantity in human mobility

Journal

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR
Volume 2, Issue 7, Pages 485-491

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0364-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Villum Foundation
  2. UCPH
  3. Danish Council for Independent Research [4184-00556]
  4. Sony Mobile Communications

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent seminal works on human mobility have shown that individuals constantly exploit a small set of repeatedly visited locations(1-3). A concurrent study has emphasized the explorative nature of human behaviour, showing that the number of visited places grows steadily over time(4-7). How to reconcile these seemingly contradicting facts remains an open question. Here, we analyse high-resolution multi-year traces of similar to 40,000 individuals from 4 datasets and show that this tension vanishes when the long-term evolution of mobility patterns is considered. We reveal that mobility patterns evolve significantly yet smoothly, and that the number of familiar locations an individual visits at any point is a conserved quantity with a typical size of similar to 25. We use this finding to improve state-of-the-art modelling of human mobility(4,8). Furthermore, shifting the attention from aggregated quantities to individual behaviour, we show that the size of an individual's set of preferred locations correlates with their number of social interactions. This result suggests a connection between the conserved quantity we identify, which as we show cannot be understood purely on the basis of time constraints, and the 'Dunbar number'(9,10) describing a cognitive upper limit to an individual's number of social relations. We anticipate that our work will spark further research linking the study of human mobility and the cognitive and behavioural sciences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available