4.8 Article

Use of low cost and easily regenerated Prussian Blue cathodes for efficient electrical energy recovery in a microbial battery

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 546-551

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ee03268c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford University
  2. U.S. NSF Engineering Research Center Re-inventing the Nation's Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt)
  3. Stanford Interdisciplinary Graduate Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbial fuel cells can directly convert chemical energy into electrical energy, but significant energy losses result from the use of O-2 as the cathode. Microbial batteries (MBs) replace conventional O-2 cathodes with solid-state cathodes that can be re-oxidized under favorable conditions, enabling more efficient energy recovery. Previously, we demonstrated proof-of-concept for MBs with a silver oxide cathode. The high cost of silver and energy required for re-oxidation make this material impractical. In this work, we evaluate Prussian Blue (PB), a hexacyano-Fe complex material, as a low-cost solid-state cathode in a single-chamber, membrane-free MB. Microbial oxidation of organic matter at the anode drives the reduction of PB. Reduced PB is re-oxidized by exposure to air. MBs equipped with a PB electrode efficiently transfer charge to PB (85% charge transfer), achieving net energy recovery efficiencies of 18-33%, with no loss of capacity over 20 cycles of operation. The operating potential for the PB electrode creates a trade-off: increasing the PB electrode potential improves the efficiency of energy recovery, but more material is required to maintain power output and ensure efficient oxidation of organic matter. Operation is otherwise straightforward: energy is only required to move reduced PB into the air then back to the MB. We conclude that PB is a promising cathode material for single-chamber, membrane-free MBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available