4.8 Article

Pyrite FeS2 for high-rate and long-life rechargeable sodium batteries

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 1309-1316

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ee03759f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. State Key Project of Fundamental Research for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology [2011CB935900]
  2. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21322101, 21231005]
  3. Ministry of Education [B12015, 113016A, ACET-13-0296]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is desirable to develop electrode materials for advanced rechargeable batteries with low cost, long life, and high-rate capability. Pyrite FeS2, as an easily obtained natural mineral, has been already commercialized in primary lithium batteries, but encountered problems in rechargeable batteries with carbonate-based electrolytes due to the limited cycle life caused by the conversion-type reaction (FeS2 + 4M -> Fe + 2M(2)S (M = Li or Na)). Herein, we demonstrate that FeS2 microspheres can be applied in room-temperature rechargeable sodium batteries with only the intercalation reaction by simultaneously selecting a compatible NaSO3CF3/diglyme electrolyte and tuning the cut-off voltage to 0.8 V. A surprisingly high-rate capability (170 mA h g(-1) at 20 A g(-1)) and unprecedented long-term cyclability (similar to 90% capacity retention for 20 000 cycles) has been obtained. We suggest that a stable electrically conductive layer-structured NaxFeS2 was formed during cycling, which enables the highly reversible sodium intercalation and deintercalation. Moreover, 18650-type sodium batteries were constructed exhibiting a high capacity of similar to 4200 mA h (corresponding to 126 W h kg(-1) and 382 W h L-1) and a capacity retention of 97% after an initial 200 cycles at 4 A during charge-discharge. This shows that the production of rechargeable sodium batteries with FeS2 microspheres is viable for commercial utilization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available