4.7 Article

An intercomparison of oceanic methane and nitrous oxide measurements

Journal

BIOGEOSCIENCES
Volume 15, Issue 19, Pages 5891-5907

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-15-5891-2018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [OCE-1546580]
  2. NSF [OCE-1260164, OCE-1437310]
  3. Center for Microbial Oceanography: Research and Education (C-MORE) [EF0424599]
  4. SCOR
  5. EU [284274]
  6. NOAA's Climate Program Office, Climate Observations Division
  7. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [3794]
  8. Simons Collaboration on Ocean Processes and Ecology (SCOPE) [329108]
  9. Global Research Laboratory Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2013K1A1A2A02078278]
  10. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CTM2015-74510-JIN]
  11. FONDAP [1511009]
  12. FONDECYT [1161138]
  13. Directorate For Geosciences [1740538] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  14. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1740538] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large-scale climatic forcing is impacting oceanic biogeochemical cycles and is expected to influence the water-column distribution of trace gases, including methane and nitrous oxide. Our ability as a scientific community to evaluate changes in the water-column inventories of methane and nitrous oxide depends largely on our capacity to obtain robust and accurate concentration measurements that can be validated across different laboratory groups. This study represents the first formal international intercomparison of oceanic methane and nitrous oxide measurements whereby participating laboratories received batches of seawater samples from the subtropical Pacific Ocean and the Baltic Sea. Additionally, compressed gas standards from the same calibration scale were distributed to the majority of participating laboratories to improve the analytical accuracy of the gas measurements. The computations used by each laboratory to derive the dissolved gas concentrations were also evaluated for inconsistencies (e.g., pressure and temperature corrections, solubility constants). The results from the intercomparison and intercalibration provided invaluable insights into methane and nitrous oxide measurements. It was observed that analyses of seawater samples with the lowest concentrations of methane and nitrous oxide had the lowest precisions. In comparison, while the analytical precision for samples with the highest concentrations of trace gases was better, the variability between the different laboratories was higher: 36 % for methane and 27 % for nitrous oxide. In addition, the comparison of different batches of seawater samples with methane and nitrous oxide concentrations that ranged over an order of magnitude revealed the ramifications of different calibration procedures for each trace gas. Finally, this study builds upon the intercomparison results to develop recommendations for improving oceanic methane and nitrous oxide measurements, with the aim of precluding future analytical discrepancies between laboratories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available