4.7 Article

Seismic fragility analysis of steel reinforced concrete frame structures based on different engineering demand parameters

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
Volume 20, Issue -, Pages 736-749

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.09.019

Keywords

Steel Reinforced Concrete (SRC) frame structures; Seismic damage index; OpenSees; Seismic fragility analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51478048]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation (innovation group) of Hubei Province [2015CFA029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nowadays, performance-based seismic design is the focus of earthquake engineering research, in which the seismic performance of a structure is mainly evaluated based on seismic fragility. However, the role of Engineering Demand Parameters (EDPs) on the seismic fragility analysis of Steel Reinforced Concrete (SRC) frame structures remains unclear. This paper presents results on the effects of EDPs on the seismic behavior of a plan-asymmetric SRC building. For this purpose, a nonlinear finite element model of the SRC frame structure was numerically developed using the OpenSees software. This finite element model was then validated using experimental results. The peak interstory drift ratios, as well as the component-based and material-based damage indices, were accordingly employed as EDPs. This study additionally shows seismic fragility curves for an SRC frame structure. The achieved results for the mentioned EDPs were both compared and analyzed. The findings indicated that the EDPs play a role in the seismic fragility analysis for the SRC frame structures. The fragility curves based on a damage index could display the probability of exceeding the ultimate limit states subjected to different seismic intensities, and also showed a similar manner with those based on peak interstory drift ratios. It can be concluded that for an SRC frame structure, the results of seismic fragility analysis using the component-based damage index proved to be more cost-effective and reliable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available