4.1 Article

Randomized Trial of Desktop Humidifier for Dry Eye Relief in Computer Users

Journal

OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE
Volume 94, Issue 11, Pages 1052-1057

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001136

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

SIGNIFICANCE: Dry eye is a frequently reported problem among computer users. Low relative humidity environments are recognized to exacerbate signs and symptoms of dry eye, yet are common in offices of computer operators. Desktop USB-powered humidifiers are available commercially, but their efficacy for dry eye relief has not been established. PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the potential for a desktop USB-powered humidifier to improve tear-film parameters, ocular surface characteristics, and subjective comfort of computer users. METHODS: Forty-four computer users were enrolled in a prospective, masked, randomized crossover study. On separate days, participants were randomized to 1 hour of continuous computer use, with and without exposure to a desktop humidifier. Lipid-layer grade, noninvasive tear-filmbreakup time, and tear meniscus height were measured before and after computer use. Following the 1-hour period, participants reported whether ocular comfort was greater, equal, or lesser than that at baseline. RESULTS: The desktop humidifier effected a relative difference in humidity between the two environments of +5.4 +/- 5.0% (P <.001). Participants demonstrated no significant differences in lipid-layer grade and tear meniscus height between the two environments (all P >.05). However, a relative increase in the median noninvasive tear film breakup time of +4.0 seconds was observed in the humidified environment ( P <.001), which was associated with a higher proportion of subjects reporting greater comfort relative to baseline (36% vs. 5%, P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Even with a modest increase in relative humidity locally, the desktop humidifier shows potential to improve tear-film stability and subjective comfort during computer use. Copyright (C) 2017 American Academy of Optometry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available