4.7 Article

Study of metal-organic framework MIL-101(Cr) for natural gas (methane) storage and compare with other MOFs (metal-organic frameworks)

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 91, Issue -, Pages 772-781

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.08.096

Keywords

Adsorption; Adsorption isotherms; GCMC (grand canonical Monte Carlo); MOFs (metal-organic frameworks); Methane storage

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation, Singapore [NRF-CRP8-2011-3]
  2. Ministry of Education [MOE 2014-T2-2-061]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Natural gas, containing mainly methane (CH4), has the potential to substitute petroleum as fuel for vehicles. However, the storage of natural gas at adequately high densities to fulfil the requirement of driving range is a challenging task. One prospective solution is the use of porous materials to adsorb natural gas at lower pressures and temperatures resulting in higher density storage. In this article, we present an extensive study on synthesis, characterization and property evaluation of MIL-101(Cr) MOF (metal-organic framework) for CH4 adsorption. At 298 K, it is observed that the total volumetric uptake of CH4 on MIL-101(Cr) MOF is about (i) 150 cm(3)/cm(3) at 35 bar, (ii) 215 cm(3)/cm(3) at 65 bar, and (iii) 30 cm(3)/cm(3) at 5 bar. Further, we have demonstrated a novel idea to store CH4 on MOFs in an ANG (adsorbed natural gas) vessel below critical point temperature employing LNG (liquefied natural gas) regasification. This LNG ANG coupling improves the competitiveness of ANG storage and increases the CH4 working capacity. Employing LNG-ANG coupling, it is found that MIL-101(Cr) exhibits high CH4 delivery or working capacity which is (i) 240 cm(3)/cm(3) for the operating parameters ranging from 6 bar at 160 K to 5 bar at 298 K, and (ii) 125 cm(3)/cm(3) for the operating parameters varying from 1.2 bar at 160 K to 5 bar at 298 K. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available