4.5 Article

Efficiently solving linear bilevel programming problems using off-the-shelf optimization software

Journal

OPTIMIZATION AND ENGINEERING
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 187-211

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11081-017-9369-y

Keywords

Bilevel programming; Mathematical programming with complementarity conditions; Nonlinear programming; Mixed-integer programming; Optimization solvers

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness [ENE2016-80638-R]
  2. Research Funding Program for Young Talented Researchers of the University of Malaga [PPIT-UMA-B1-2017/18]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many optimization models in engineering are formulated as bilevel problems. Bilevel optimization problems are mathematical programs where a subset of variables is constrained to be an optimal solution of another mathematical program. Due to the lack of optimization software that can directly handle and solve bilevel problems, most existing solution methods reformulate the bilevel problem as a mathematical program with complementarity conditions (MPCC) by replacing the lower-level problem with its necessary and sufficient optimality conditions. MPCCs are single-level non-convex optimization problems that do not satisfy the standard constraint qualifications and therefore, nonlinear solvers may fail to provide even local optimal solutions. In this paper we propose a method that first solves iteratively a set of regularized MPCCs using an off-the-shelf nonlinear solver to find a local optimal solution. Local optimal information is then used to reduce the computational burden of solving the Fortuny-Amat reformulation of the MPCC to global optimality using off-the-shelf mixed-integer solvers. This method is tested using a wide range of randomly generated examples. The results show that our method outperforms existing general-purpose methods in terms of computational burden and global optimality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available