4.5 Article

Performance and uncertainties of TSS stormwater sampling strategies from online time series

Journal

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 6, Pages 1407-1416

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2018.415

Keywords

automated sampler; event mean concentration; measurements representativeness; online monitoring; stormwater sampling

Funding

  1. COLCIENCIAS (Colombian Institute for the Development of Science and Technology)
  2. Greater Lyon and Rhone-Mediterranee Corse Water Agency
  3. Veolia Water
  4. Berliner Wasserbetriebe
  5. Austrian Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management
  6. Holding Graz Services Water Management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The event mean concentrations (EMCs) that would have been obtained by four different stormwater sampling strategies are simulated by using total suspended solids (TSS) and flowrate time series (about one minute time-step and one year of data). These EMCs are compared to the reference EMCs calculated by considering the complete time series. The sampling strategies are assessed with datasets from four catchments: (i) Berlin, Germany, combined sewer overflow (CSO); (ii) Graz, Austria, CSO; (iii) Chassieu, France, separate sewer system; and (iv) Ecully, France, CSO. A sampling strategy in which samples are collected at constant time intervals over the rainfall event and sampling volumes are pre-set as proportional to the runoff volume discharged between two consecutive sample leads to the most representative results. Recommended sampling time intervals are of 5 min for Berlin and Chassieu (resp. 100 and 185 ha area) and 10 min for Graz and Ecully (resp. 335 and 245 ha area), with relative sampling errors between 7% and 20% and uncertainties in sampling errors of about 5%. Uncertainties related to sampling volumes, TSS laboratory analyses and beginning/ending of rainstorm events are reported as the most influent sources in the uncertainties of sampling errors and EMCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available