4.4 Article

Genotyping Polyploids from Messy Sequencing Data

Journal

GENETICS
Volume 210, Issue 3, Pages 789-807

Publisher

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.301468

Keywords

GBS; RAD-Seq; sequencing; hierarchical modeling; read-mapping bias

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [HG002585]
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [4559]
  3. FAPESP/CAPES (Sao Paulo Research Foundation) [2014/20389-2]
  4. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detecting and quantifying the differences in individual genomes (i.e., genotyping), plays a fundamental role in most modern bioinformatics pipelines. Many scientists now use reduced representation next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches for genotyping. Genotyping diploid individuals using NGS is a well-studied field, and similar methods for polyploid individuals are just emerging. However, there are many aspects of NGS data, particularly in polyploids, that remain unexplored by most methods. Our contributions in this paper are fourfold: (i) We draw attention to, and then model, common aspects of NGS data: sequencing error, allelic bias, overdispersion, and outlying observations. (ii) Many datasets feature related individuals, and so we use the structure of Mendelian segregation to build an empirical Bayes approach for genotyping polyploid individuals. (iii) We develop novel models to account for preferential pairing of chromosomes, and harness these for genotyping. (iv) We derive oracle genotyping error rates that may be used for read depth suggestions. We assess the accuracy of our method in simulations, and apply it to a dataset of hexaploid sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). An R package implementing our method is available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=updog.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available