4.6 Article

Detailed optical modelling and light-management of thin-film organic solar cells with consideration of small-area effects

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages A176-A190

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.25.00A176

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P2-0197, J2-5466]
  2. EU project SOLPROCEL - Solution processed high performance transparent organic photovoltaic cells [604506]
  3. Aufbmch Bayern initiative of the state of Bavaria
  4. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present detailed numerical and experimental investigation of thin-film organic solar cells with a micro-textured light management foil applied on top of the front glass substrate. We first demonstrate that measurements of small-area laboratory solar cells are susceptible to a significant amount of optical losses that could lead to false interpretation of the measurement results. Using the combined optical model CROWM calibrated with realistic optical properties of organic films and other layers, we identify the origins of these losses and quantify the extent of their influence. Further on, we identify the most important light management mechanisms of the micro-textured foil, among which the prevention of light escaping at the front side of the cell is revealed as the dominant one. Detailed three-dimensional simulations show that the light-management foil applied on top of a large-area organic solar cell can reduce the total reflection losses by nearly 60% and improve the short-circuit current density by almost 20%. Finally, by assuming realistic open-circuit voltage and especially the realistic fill factor that deteriorates as the absorber layer thickness is increased, we determine the optimal absorber layer thickness that would result in the highest power conversion efficiency of the investigated organic solar cells. (C) 2017 Optical Society of America

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available