4.7 Article

Synchrotron Radiation from the Fast Tail of Dynamical Ejecta of Neutron Star Mergers

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 867, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadf92

Keywords

gamma-ray burst: individual (GRB 170817A); stars: neutron

Funding

  1. Lyman Spitzer, Jr. fellowship at Department of Astrophysical sciences at Princeton University
  2. ERC grant TReX
  3. Templeton foundation
  4. I-Core center of excellence of the Israeli Science Foundation
  5. K computer at AICS [hp160211, hp170230, hp170313]
  6. JSPS [16H02183, 17H06361, 15K05077]
  7. Japanese MEXT [9]
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17H06361, 16H02183, 15K05077] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We find, using high-resolution numerical relativistic simulations, that the tail of the dynamical ejecta of neutron star mergers extends to mildly relativistic velocities faster than 0.7c. The kinetic energy of this fast tail is similar to 10(47)-10(49) erg, depending on the neutron star equation of state and on the binary masses. The synchrotron flare arising from the interaction of this fast tail with the surrounding interstellar medium (ISM) can power the observed nonthermal emission that followed GW170817, provided that the ISM density is similar to 10(-2) cm(-3), the two neutron stars had roughly equal masses and the neutron star equation of state is soft (small neutron star radii). One of the generic predictions of this scenario is that the cooling frequency crosses the X-ray band on a timescale of a few months to a year, leading to a cooling break in the X-ray light curve. While the recent observation of the superluminal motion resolved by very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) rules out the dynamical ejecta scenario, the model described in this paper is generic and can be applied for future neutron star merger events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available