4.6 Article

Effect of heat treatment on absorption and fluorescence properties of PbS-doped silica optical fibre

Journal

OPTICAL MATERIALS
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages 468-473

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2017.01.022

Keywords

Optical fibre; PbS quantum dot; Heat treatment; Spectroscopy; Optical materials

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61520106014, 61475096, 61227012, 61275051, 61635006, 61422507]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [15220721500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of heat treatment on the optical properties of a PUS-doped silica optical fibre was investigated. The experimental results showed that the absorption peak of the fibre red shifted from 1032 to 1133 nm when the heat treatment temperatures were carried out at 900, 950, 1000, and 1100 degrees C for 1 h, respectively. At the same time, when the heat treatment at 900 degrees C was carried out for 2, 5, 10, 20, and 40 h, the absorption spectra of the fibre showed a red shift from 1074 to 1143 nm. In addition, the intensity of the absorption peak increased from 0.258 to 1384 dB/m and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) became narrower (from 130 to 50 nm) as the heat treatment proceeded. Moreover, the photoluminescence (PL) intensity in the wavelength range of 1100-1500'nm decreased with an increase in the heat treatment temperature. The theoretical analysis, using an effective mass method, showed that the effective band gap energy and average size of the lead sulphide (PbS) quantum dots (QDs) in the silica fibre core varied from 1.199 to 1.083 eV and from 4.28 to 4.81 nm, respectively. The results indicate that the size of the PbS QDs present in the silica fibre core could be controlled by a proper heat treatment, which is of great interest in optical fibre amplifiers and other fibre optic devices. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available