4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Luminescence of Mn4+ ions in CaTiO3 and MgTiO3 perovskites: Relationship of experimental spectroscopic data and crystal field calculations

Journal

OPTICAL MATERIALS
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages 46-51

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2017.03.021

Keywords

Red luminescence; Mn4+; Perovskite; Crystal field; LED

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [171022]
  2. Cluster of excellence MATISSE [ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02]
  3. DGA (Direction Generale de L'Armement, France)
  4. a [451-03-39/2016-09/19]
  5. Recruitment Program of High-end Foreign Experts [GDW20145200225]
  6. Ministry of Education and Research of Estonia [PUT430]
  7. European Regional Development Fund [TK141]
  8. g [451-03-39/2016-09/19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Herein, the synthesis, structural and crystal field analysis and optical spectroscopy of Mn4+ doped metal titanates ATiO(3) (A = Ca, Mg) are presented. Materials of desired phase were prepared by molten salt assisted sol-gel method in the powder form. Crystallographic data of samples were obtained by refinement of X-ray diffraction measurements. From experimental excitation and emission spectra and structural data, crystal field parameters and energy levels of Mn4+ in CaTiO3 and MgTiO3 were calculated by the exchange charge model of crystal-field theory. It is found that crystalline field strength is lower (Dq = 1831 cm(-1)) in the rhombohedral Ilmenite MgTiO3 structure due to the relatively longer average Mn4+-O2- bond distance (2.059 angstrom), and higher (Dq = 2017 cm(-1)) in orthorhombic CaTiO3 which possess shorter average Mn4+-O2- bond distance (1.956 angstrom). Spectral positions of the Mn(4+2)Eg -> (4)A(2g) transition maxima is 709 nm in MgTiO3 and 717 nm in CaTiO3 respectively in good agreement with calculated values. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available