4.6 Article

Multi-View Gait Recognition Based on a Spatial-Temporal Deep Neural Network

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages 57583-57596

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2874073

Keywords

Multi-view; gait recognition; STG; LSTM; STDNN

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [61472244]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [U1536203, 61272409]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a novel spatial-temporal deep neural network (STDNN) that is applied to multi-view gait recognition. The STDNN comprises a temporal feature network (TFN) and a spatial feature network (SFN). In TFN, a feature sub-network is adopted to extract the low-level edge features of gait silhouettes. These features are input to the spatial-temporal gradient (STG) network that adopts a STG unit and a long short-term memory unit to extract the STG features. In SFN, the spatial features of gait sequences are extracted by multilayer convolutional neural networks from a gait energy image. The SFN is optimized by classification loss and verification loss jointly, which makes inter-class variations larger than intra-class variations. After training, the TFN and the SFN are employed to extract temporal and spatial features, respectively, which are applied to multi-view gait recognition. Finally, the combined predicted probability is adopted to identify individuals by the differences in their gaits. To evaluate the performance of the STDNN, extensive evaluations are carried out based on the CASIA-B, OU-ISIR, and CMU MoBo data sets. The best recognition scores achieved by STDNN are 95.67% under an identical view, 93.64% under a cross-view, and 92.54% under a multi-view. State-of-the-art approaches are compared with the STDNN in various situations. The results show that the STDNN outperforms the other methods and demonstrates the great potential of the STDNN for practical applications in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available