4.6 Article

Visual Acuity Change over 12 Months in the Prospective Progression of Atrophy Secondary to Stargardt Disease (ProgStar) Study

Journal

OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 124, Issue 11, Pages 1640-1651

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.04.026

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. LabEx Life Senses, ERC Synergy, Banque Publique d'Investissement
  2. Acucela, Inc.
  3. NightstaRx Ltd
  4. QLT, Inc.
  5. University of Basel
  6. Foundation Fighting Blindness Clinical Research Institute
  7. United States Department of Defense USAMRMC TATRC, Fort Meade, Maryland [W81-XWH-07-1-0720, W81XWH-09-2-0189]
  8. Shulsky Foundation, New York, New York
  9. Ocular Albinism Research Fund (Clark Enterprises, Inc)
  10. Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc, New York, New York
  11. Baylor-Johns Hopkins Center for Mendelian Genetics (National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland) [1U54HG006542-01]
  12. Austrian Science Fund [J 3383-B23]
  13. El Maghraby professorship
  14. National Institutes of Health [K25AI114461]
  15. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust
  16. UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
  17. Fight For Sight, UK
  18. Macular Society
  19. United Kingdom
  20. Moorfields Eye Hospital Special Trustees, London, United Kingdom
  21. Moorfields Eye Charity, London, United Kingdom
  22. Foundation Fighting Blindness
  23. Retinitis Pigmentosa Fighting Blindness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To estimate the yearly rate of change of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the risk of loss 1 line or more over 1 year and to identify risk factors for BCVA loss in patients with Stargardt disease (STGD1). Design: Multicenter, prospective cohort study. Participants: Two hundred fifty-nine patients (489 eyes) with molecularly confirmed STGD1 enrolled at 9 centers in the United States and Europe. Methods: Participants were followed up every 6 months, and data at the baseline and 6-and 12-month visits were analyzed. Best-corrected visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Standardized reporting forms were used to collect participants' characteristics and clinical observations. Linear mixed effects models were used to estimate the rate of BCVA loss. Linear models with generalized estimating equations were used to identify risk factors for BCVA loss of 1 line or more over 1 year. Main Outcome Measures: Change in BCVA over 1 year. Results: Cross-sectional analysis at baseline showed that earlier symptom onset and longer duration since onset was associated with worse BCVA. Longitudinal analysis showed no overall significant change of BCVA within 12 months, but the rate of BCVA change was significantly different by baseline BCVA (P < 0.001). The BCVA of eyes with baseline BCVA of 20/25 or better declined at a rate of 2.8 ETDRS letters per year (P = 0.10), eyes with baseline BCVA between 20/25 and 20/70 declined at a rate of 2.3 ETDRS letters per year (P = 0.002), eyes with baseline BCVA between 20/70 and 20/200 declined at a rate of 0.8 ETDRS letters per year (P = 0.08), and eyes with baseline BCVA worse than 20/200 showed a significant improvement of 2.3 ETDRS letters per year (P < 0.001). Overall, 12.9% of eyes lost 1 line or more, and the risk of such BCVA loss was different by baseline BCVA level (P = 0.016). Smoking and vitamin A use was not associated significantly with baseline BCVA, nor with rate of BCVA loss over 1 year. Conclusions: Change in BCVA in STGD1 patients over a 12-month period was small, but varied depending on baseline BCVA. Given the slow change during 1 year, BCVA is unlikely to be a sensitive outcome measure for STGD1 treatment trials with 1 year's duration. (C) 2017 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available