4.5 Article

Sleep and Cardiovascular Disease: Emerging Opportunities for Psychology

Journal

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST
Volume 73, Issue 8, Pages 994-1006

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/amp0000362

Keywords

cardiovascular disease; sleep; psychosocial factors; sleep duration; insomnia

Funding

  1. National Institute of Heart, Lung, and Blood Disorders [R01 HL104607, R01 AG047139, F32 HL137227, T32 HL082610]
  2. National Institute on Aging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sleep disturbances and disorders have been implicated in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Converging evidence suggests that psychosocial factors that confer risk or resilience to cardiovascular disease (CVD) are also related to sleep. Profound differences in sleep among racial/ethnic minorities compared with non-Hispanic Whites in the United States suggest that sleep, and its interplay with psychosocial factors, may contribute to observed disparities in CVD and in health and functioning more broadly. Less understood is the extent to which sleep and psychosocial factors interact to influence the pathophysiology and clinical course of CVD. This article reviews observational and experimental evidence linking short sleep duration and insomnia, both modifiable sleep disturbances, to CVD, including key physiological mechanisms. Also reviewed is evidence of significant interrelationships among sleep, race/ethnicity, and psychosocial factors known to confer risk or resilience to CVD, including depression, psychological stress, and close interpersonal relationships. It is proposed that a transdisciplinary research framework that integrates knowledge, methods, and measures from the fields of psychology and sleep research may be used to catalyze advances in the prevention and treatment of CVD. Also discussed are promising new directions, expected challenges, and the importance of training in transdisciplinary science and research approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available