4.6 Article

Data for the Sustainable Development Goals: Metrics for Evaluating Civil Registration and Vital Statistics Systems Data Relevance and Production Capacity, Illustrations with Nigeria

Journal

SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH
Volume 140, Issue 1, Pages 101-124

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-017-1760-8

Keywords

CRVS; SDGs; Relevance analysis; Data types; NSS capacity; Assessment; Nigeria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three issues impinging on the potential use of Civil Registration and Vital Statistics (CRVS) data for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are analysed in the paper. These include CRVS data relevance, content and data production capacity of CRVS systems. The paper adopts a data type' approach to relevance and capacity and proposes two metrics based on a graded qualitative evaluation (GQE)methodology. One is a data-relevance metric for evaluating the relevance of CRVS data types to the SDGs. The second is a National Statistical Systems (NSS) data type production capacity metric used for evaluating the data productioncapacity of CRVS systems. CRVS data instrument analysis and the CRVS data production capacity are exemplified with the Nigerian CRVS system. Relevance assessment results suggest that CRVS systems can provide data relevant to 25% of the SDGs. However the SDG data contribution of CRVS depends on the data type' capacity of National CRVS systems. As the capacity assessment shows, the Nigerian CRVS system has nominal' capacity to produce all CRVS data types (fertility, mortality, migration, nuptiality and socio-economic) and active' and latent' capacities to provide data for some 21 SDG targets. However, it currently lacks effective' capacity to produce any of the data types for the SDGs. The paper has implications for goal setting and prioritization in evolving strategies to enhance the development of CRVS/NSS systems' data capacities, especially in developing countries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available