4.6 Article

Growth, Development, Leaf Gaseous Exchange, and Grain Yield Response of Maize Cultivars to Drought and Flooding Stress

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su10103492

Keywords

grain yield components; grain yield; leaf area index; photosynthesis; stomatal conductance

Funding

  1. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) [613817]
  2. Department of Science and Technology, South Africa
  3. National Research Foundation
  4. University of Pretoria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prevalence of extreme drought and flooding is posing a threat to the food security of Sub-Saharan African countries. There are national and international calls for actions to investigate the level of resilience of existing crop cultivars to multiple abiotic stress conditions. A two-year study was carried out in South Africa to determine growth, development, yield, yield components, and physiological responses of two contrasting maize cultivarsPAN 413 (drought tolerant) and PAN 6Q-245 (drought intolerant) under drought and flooding. The drought effect on grain yield was more pronounced from mid-vegetative to tasselling stages, regardless of the cultivar with yields deviating from the control by 53-58% (2015/2016) and 34-42% (2016/2017). The effect of flooding on grain yield was pronounced at the early vegetative stage for both cultivars, with yield reductions ranging between 26-30% (2015/2016) and 15-21% (2016/2017). Results from the study indicated that existing maize cultivars (drought tolerant and drought intolerant) are both prone to likely extreme drought events experienced during the tasselling stage. Results also showed that both cultivars are prone to probable flooding events before the tasselling stage. It is recommended that plant breeders' efforts be directed to developing maize cultivars with multiple stress tolerances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available