4.6 Article

Structural Analysis of the Complexation of Uranyl, Neptunyl, Plutonyl, and Americyl with Cyclic Imide Dioximes

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 3, Issue 10, Pages 13984-13993

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02068

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Nuclear Security Administration under the Stewardship Science Academic Alliance Program [DOE-NNSA-DE-NA0001983]
  2. National Science Foundation [ACI-0904972, ACI-1450300, CHE-1709881, ACI-1548562]
  3. Y-12 National Security Complex project [PD15N610]
  4. NWChem-Ex Exascale Computing Project from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) at Brookhaven National Laboratory [DE-SC0012704]
  5. University of Tennessee
  6. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Joint Institute for Computational Sciences
  7. UNT Office of Research and Economic Development
  8. DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  9. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725, DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowledge-based design of extracting agents for selective binding of actinides is essential in stock-pile stewardship, environmental remediation separations, and nuclear fuel disposal. Robust computational protocols are critical for in depth understanding of structural properties land to further advance the design of selective ligands. In particular, rapid radiochemical separations require predictive capabilities for binding in the gas phase. This study focuses on gas phase binding preferences of cyclic imide dioximes to uranyl, neptunyl, plutonyl, and americyl Structural properties, electron withdrawing effects, and their effects on binding preferences are studied with natural bond-order population analysis. The aromatic amidoximes are found to have a larger electron-donation effect than the aliphatic amidoximes. It is also found that plutonyl is more electron withdrawing than uranyl, neptunyl, and americyl when bound to the cyclic imide dioximes studied.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available