4.4 Article

Outcome of All-Oral Direct-Acting Antiviral Regimens on the Rate of Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1-Related Chronic Liver Disease

Journal

ONCOLOGY
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages 92-98

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000470910

Keywords

Hepatitis C virus; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Direct-acting antivirals; Sustained virological response

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan [H25-KANEN-001, H26-KANEN-012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: There is little information on the risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and outcome of treatment with an all-oral combination of direct-acting antiviral regimens following eradication of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA. Methods: The study subjects were 1,170 patients with HCV genotype 1-related chronic liver disease treated with either NS5A inhibitor plus NS3/4A protease inhibitor (n = 707), NS5A inhibitor plus NS5B polymerase inhibitor (n = 345), or NS5A inhibitor, NS3/4A protease inhibitor plus ritonavir (n = 118), for 12-24 weeks. All patients were free of HCC before and during therapy. Results: In this retrospective study, 22 patients developed HCC during the follow-up (time from the end of antiviral therapy until the last visit: 1.3 years). At 1 and 2 years after completion of the treatment, the cumulative HCC rates for the whole group were 1.8 and 2.3%, respectively, and 1.4 and 1.8%, respectively, for 1,065 patients who showed sustained virological response (SVR). The risk factors for HCC identified by multivariate analysis were hypoalbuminemia, thrombocytopenia, a high alpha-fetoprotein level, and non-SVR for all patients, and hypoalbuminemia and a high a-fetoprotein level for patients with SVR. Conclusion: Eradication of HCV RNA by direct-acting antiviral regimens might reduce the risk of HCC. Albumin and a-fetoprotein levels are significant risk factors for HCC. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available