4.2 Article

Current Clinical Recommendations for Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma

Journal

CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 624-634

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12178-018-9527-7

Keywords

Platelet-rich plasma; PRP; Orthobiologics; Regenerative medicine; Tendinopathy; Osteoarthritis

Categories

Funding

  1. Linvatec
  2. Ossur
  3. Smith and Nephew
  4. Breg

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of ReviewThis review evaluates current clinical literature on the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), including leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP) and leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP), in order to develop evidence-based recommendations for various musculoskeletal indications.Recent FindingsAbundant high-quality evidence supports the use of LR-PRP injection for lateral epicondylitis and LP-PRP for osteoarthritis of the knee. Moderate high-quality evidence supports the use of LR-PRP injection for patellar tendinopathy and of PRP injection for plantar fasciitis and donor site pain in patellar tendon graft BTB ACL reconstruction. There is insufficient evidence to routinely recommend PRP for rotator cuff tendinopathy, osteoarthritis of the hip, or high ankle sprains. Current evidence demonstrates a lack of efficacy of PRP for Achilles tendinopathy, muscle injuries, acute fracture or nonunion, surgical augmentation in rotator cuff repair, Achilles tendon repair, and ACL reconstruction.SummaryPRP is a promising treatment for some musculoskeletal diseases; however, evidence of its efficacy has been highly variable depending on the specific indication. Additional high-quality clinical trials with longer follow-up will be critical in shaping our perspective of this treatment option.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available