4.5 Article

Integrated Assessment of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in South Africa's Power Sector

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages 14380-14406

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en81212432

Keywords

carbon capture and storage (CCS); South Africa; integrated assessment; power sector; CO2 storage potential; competing policy targets; emerging economies

Categories

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety [09.9022.6-001]
  2. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy within program Open Access Publishing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents an integrated assessment conducted in order to explore whether carbon capture and storage (CCS) could be a viable technological option for significantly reducing future CO2 emissions in South Africa. The methodological approach covers a commercial availability analysis, an analysis of the long-term usable CO2 storage potential (based on storage capacity assessment, energy scenario analysis and source-sink matching), an economic and ecological assessment and a stakeholder analysis. The findings show, that a reliable storage capacity assessment is needed, since only rough figures concerning the effective capacity currently exist. Further constraints on the fast deployment of CCS may be the delayed commercial availability of CCS, significant barriers to increasing the economic viability of CCS, an expected net maximum reduction rate of the power plant's greenhouse gas emissions of 67%-72%, an increase in other environmental and social impacts, and low public awareness of CCS. One precondition for opting for CCS would be to find robust solutions to these constraints, taking into account that CCS could potentially conflict with other important policy objectives, such as affordable electricity rates to give the whole population access to electricity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available