4.7 Article

The power-capture of a nearshore, modular, flap-type wave energy converter in regular waves

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 137, Issue -, Pages 394-403

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.04.016

Keywords

Wave energy converter; Power; Modular Flap

Funding

  1. Energy Technologies Institute (ETI)
  2. RCUK Energy Programme for the Industrial Doctoral Centre for Offshore Renewable Energy [EP/J500847/1]
  3. Aquamarine Power Ltd
  4. QUB
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M014738/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/M014738/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bottom-hinged, nearshore flap-type wave energy converters (WECs), have several advantages, such as high power conversion efficiency and survivability. They typically comprise a single flap spanning their full width. However, a potentially beneficial design change would be to split the flap into multiple modules, to make a 'Modular Flap'. This could provide improvements, such as increased power-capture, reduced foundation loads and lower manufacturing and installation costs. Assessed in this work is the hydrodynamic power-capture of this device, based on physical modelling. Comparisons are made to an equivalent 'Rigid Flap'. Tests are conducted in regular, head-on and off-angle waves. The simplest control strategy, of damping each module equally, is employed. The results show that, for head-on waves, the power increases towards the centre of the device, with the central modules generating 68% of the total power. Phase differences are also present. Consequently, the total power produced by the Modular Flap is, on average, 23% more smooth than that generated by the Rigid Flap. The Modular Flap has 3% and 1% lower average power-capture than the Rigid Flap in head-on and off-angle waves, respectively. The advantages of the modular concept may therefore be exploited without significantly compromising the power-capture of the flap-type WEC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available