4.7 Article

Experimental validation of a dynamic mooring lines code with tension and motion measurements of a submerged chain

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages 415-427

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.10.051

Keywords

Mooring line; Lumped mass; Dynamic; Experiment; Validation; Wave tank

Funding

  1. MARINET, a European Community Research Infrastructure Action under the FP7 Capacities Specific Programme
  2. European Community's FP7 INNWIND.EU project [308974]
  3. Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation [TRA2013-41096-P]
  4. Norwegian Research Centre for Offshore Wind Technology (NOWITECH)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper shows a complete study of the dynamics of a mooring line: first, a simulation code based on a lumped mass formulation was developed and tested under different setups and second, an equivalent experimental campaign was performed to compare against the numerical predictions. The tests consisted of a suspended chain submerged into a water basin, where the suspension point of the chain was excited with horizontal harmonic motions of different periods in the plane of the catenary. The code is able to predict the tension at the suspension point and the motions of the line with accuracy. For those cases where the line loses and subsequently recovers tension, the resulting snap load and motions are well captured with a slight over prediction of the maximum tension. The added mass and drag coefficients for chains used in the computations have been taken from guidelines and, in general, predict correctly the hydrodynamic loads. In addition, sensitivity studies and verification against another code show that highly dynamic cases are sensitive to the seabed-cable contact and friction models. The results show the importance of capturing the evolution of the mooring dynamics for the prediction of the line tension, especially for the high frequency motions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available