4.7 Article

The effect of the extension of the instrumentation on the measured ice-induced load on a ship hull

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages 327-339

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.09.056

Keywords

Ice load; Full-scale; Uncertainty in measurements; Load length; The extension of the instrumentation

Funding

  1. Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation [40508/11]
  2. Academy of Finland [264354]
  3. Lloyd's Register Foundation (the grant for Centre of Excellence for Arctic Shipping and Operations)
  4. Tekes project Full-scale ice trial [NB1369]
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [264354, 264354] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the complexity of the ice-structure interaction, the knowledge about the ice-induced loads on a ship hull has been gained from full-scale measurements. As the instrumentation of the hull for the measurements is expensive, the extension is concerned at the planning phase. However, a narrow instrumentation can cause an error in the measurements, as the response of the adjacent frames with respect to the observed frame is not known. Thus, this paper studies the differences between loads measured from one or several frames on board S.A. Agulhas II. The difference results from the ability of the structure to transport loading internally. The results show that when the loads affect only an individual frame, the instrumentations give similar results. However, the difference increases with the load length and the loading that is determined can be 15% higher for one frame instrumentation for a structure similar to the aft shoulder of S.A. Agulhas LT. Furthermore, the difference in the mean value and standard deviation of the measurement time histories can be up to 10%. The study presents a new efficient method to obtain a rough estimate of the possible difference in the measured results between extensive and narrow instrumentation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available