3.8 Review

Stem Cell-Based Therapies and Tissue Engineering of Trachea as Promising Therapeutic Methods in Mustard Gas Exposed Patients

Journal

Publisher

AVICENNA ORGAN TRANSPLANT CENTER

Keywords

Stem cell; Cell-based therapies; Tissue engineering; Trachea; Mustard gas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tissue engineering and cell-based therapies are promising therapeutic approaches in structural and functional defects of the trachea. Researchers have focused on these approaches to overcome the complications related to such diseases. Patients exposed to mustard gas suffer from massive damage to the respiratory system. Current treatment plans are only palliative and include anti-inflammatory drugs, broncholytics, long-acting beta(2)-agonists, and inhaled corticosteroids. As mustard gas exposure leads to chronic airway inflammation, it seems that tracheobronchomalacia, because of chronic inflammation and weakness of the supporting cartilage, is an important factor in the development of chronic and refractory respiratory symptoms. The previous studies show that regenerative medicine approaches have promising potential to improve the life quality of patients suffering from tracheal defects. It seems that the engineered tracheal graft may improve the respiratory function and decrease symptoms in patients who suffer from asthma-like attacks due to mustard gas exposure. There are several successful case reports on the transplantation of stem cell-based bioartificial grafts in structural airway diseases. Therefore, we hope that the reconstruction of tracheobronchial structure can lead to a decrease in respiratory difficulties in mustard gas-exposed patients who suffer from tracheomalacia. In the present review, we summarize the main aspects of tracheal tissue engineering and cell-based therapies and the possibilities of the application of these approaches in mustard gas-exposed patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available