4.6 Article

Diagnostic Tests for Evaluation of Stillbirth Results From the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network

Journal

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Volume 129, Issue 4, Pages 699-706

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001937

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development: Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island [U10-HD045953]
  2. Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia [U10-HD045925]
  3. University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas [U10-HD045952]
  4. University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antoni, Texas [U10-HD045955]
  5. University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah [U10-HD045944]
  6. RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina [U01-HD045954]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the usefulness of each diagnostic test in the work-up for potential causes of stillbirth. METHODS: A secondary analysis of 512 stillbirths enrolled in the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network from 2006 to 2008 was performed. The Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network was a multisite, geographically, racially, and ethnically diverse, population-based study of stillbirth in the United States. Participants underwent standardized evaluations that included maternal interview, medical record abstraction, biospecimen collection, fetal autopsy, and placental pathology. Also, most participants had a clinical work-up that included karyotype, toxicology screen, syphilis serology, antibody screen, fetal-maternal hemorrhage testing, and testing for antiphospholipid antibodies as well as testing performed on biospecimens for research purposes. Previously, each participant had been assigned probable and possible causes of death using the Initial Causes of Fetal Death classification system. In this analysis, tests were considered useful if a positive result established (or helped to establish) this cause of death or a negative result excluded a cause of death that was suspected based on the clinical history or other results. RESULTS: The usefulness of each test was as follows: placental pathology 64.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 57.9-72.0), fetal autopsy 42.4% (95% CI 36.9-48.4), genetic testing 11.9% (95% CI 9.1-15.3), testing for anti-phospholipid antibodies 11.1% (95% CI 8.4-14.4), fetal-maternal hemorrhage 6.4% (95% CI 4.4-9.1), glucose screen 1.6% (95% CI 0.7-3.1), parvovirus 0.4% (95% CI 0.0-1.4), and syphilis 0.2% (95% CI 0.0-1.1). The utility of the tests varied by clinical presentation, suggesting a customized approach for each patient. CONCLUSION: The most useful tests were placental pathology and fetal autopsy followed by genetic testing and testing for antiphospholipid antibodies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available