4.6 Article

The Second APOKASC Catalog: The Empirical Approach

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 239, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaebfd

Keywords

stars abundances; stars: fundamental parameters; stars: oscillations (including pulsations)

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF PHY17-48958]
  2. NASA [NNX17AJ40G, NNX15AF13G, NNX14AB92G]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A5A1070354]
  4. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [664931]
  5. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  6. NASA through the Astrophysics Division of the Science Mission Directorate [16-XRP16 2-0004]
  7. CNES
  8. CNESDAGH
  9. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [AYA-2014-58082-P, AYA-2017-88254-P]
  10. PRIN INAF [2014CRA1.05.01.94.05]
  11. Crafoord Foundation
  12. Stiftelsen Olle Engkvist Byggmastare
  13. European Research Council under the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC [338251]
  14. NSF [AST-1411685]
  15. Ramon y Cajal fellowship [RYC-2015-17697]
  16. Premium Postdoctoral Research Program of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  17. Hungarian NKFI grants of the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office [K-119517]
  18. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship [FT1400147]
  19. U.S. National Science Foundation [PHY-1430152]
  20. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  21. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  22. Brazilian Participation Group
  23. Carnegie Institution for Science
  24. Carnegie Mellon University
  25. Chilean Participation Group
  26. French Participation Group
  27. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
  28. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  29. Johns Hopkins University
  30. Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (IPMU)/University of Tokyo
  31. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  32. Leibniz Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)
  33. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie (MPIA Heidelberg)
  34. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik (MPA Garching)
  35. Max-Planck-Institut fur Extraterrestrische Physik (MPE)
  36. National Astronomical Observatories of China
  37. New Mexico State University
  38. New York University
  39. University of Notre Dame
  40. Observatario Nacional/MCTI
  41. Ohio State University
  42. Pennsylvania State University
  43. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
  44. United Kingdom Participation Group
  45. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  46. University of Arizona
  47. University of Colorado Boulder
  48. University of Oxford
  49. University of Portsmouth
  50. University of Utah
  51. University of Virginia
  52. University of Washington
  53. University of Wisconsin
  54. Vanderbilt University
  55. Yale University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a catalog of stellar properties for a large sample of 6676 evolved stars with Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment spectroscopic parameters and Kepler asteroseismic data analyzed using five independent techniques. Our data include evolutionary state, surface gravity, mean density, mass, radius, age, and the spectroscopic and asteroseismic measurements used to derive them. We employ a new empirical approach for combining asteroseismic measurements from different methods, calibrating the inferred stellar parameters, and estimating uncertainties. With high statistical significance, we find that asteroseismic parameters inferred from the different pipelines have systematic offsets that are not removed by accounting for differences in their solar reference values. We include theoretically motivated corrections to the large frequency spacing (Av) scaling relation, and we calibrate the zero-point of the frequency of the maximum power (vmax) relation to be consistent with masses and radii for members of star clusters. For most targets, the parameters returned by different pipelines are in much better agreement than would be expected from the pipeline-predicted random errors, but 22% of them had at least one method not return a result and a much larger measurement dispersion. This supports the usage of multiple analysis techniques for asteroseismic stellar population studies. The measured dispersion in mass estimates for fundamental calibrators is consistent with our error model, which yields median random and systematic mass uncertainties for RGB stars of order 4%. Median random and systematic mass uncertainties are at the 9% and 8% level, respectively, for red clump stars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available