4.5 Review

Converting citrus wastes into value-added products: Economic and environmently friendly approaches

Journal

NUTRITION
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages 29-46

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2016.09.006

Keywords

Citrus waste; Dietary fibers; Extraction methods; Enzymes; Phytochemicals

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP) [NRF-2014 R1 A2 A1 A11052391]
  2. Nano Material Technology Development Program [2012 M3 A7 B4049675]
  3. Priority Research Centers Program of the Ministry of Education [2014 R1 A6 A1031189]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014R1A2A1A11052391, 2012M3A7B4049677, 2014R1A6A1031189] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Citrus fruits, including oranges, grapefruits, lemons, limes, tangerines, and mandarins, are among the most widely cultivated fruits around the globe. Its production is increasing every year due to rising consumer demand. Citrus-processing industries generate huge amounts of wastes every year, and citrus peel waste alone accounts for almost 50% of the wet fruit mass. Citrus waste is of immense economic value as it contains an abundance of various flavonoids, carotenoids, dietary fiber, sugars, polyphenols, essential oils, and ascorbic acid, as well as considerable amounts of some trace elements. Citrus waste also contains high levels of sugars suitable for fermentation for bio-ethanol production. However, compounds such as D-limonene must be removed for efficient bioethanol production. The aim of the present article was to review the latest advances in various popular methods of extraction for obtaining value-added products from citrus waste/byproducts and their potential utility as a source of various functional compounds. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available