4.7 Article

Multifunctional Lithium-Ion-Exchanged Zeolite-Coated Separator for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Journal

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 1, Issue 12, Pages 7237-+

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.8b01716

Keywords

zeolite; lithium-ion exchange; ceramic coating; separator; lithium-ion batteries

Funding

  1. Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies, Advanced Battery Materials Research (BMR) programs of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-EE0007787]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Positive electrodes utilizing more manganese are the primary choices for lithium-ion battery applications in electric vehicles and other large-scale energy storage systems because of the high price of cobalt. However, manganese deposition on negative electrode after its dissolution to electrolyte can cause capacity decay. To address this challenge, in this work, a multifunctional polymeric separator with lithium-ion-exchanged zeolite (Li-zeolite) coating has been developed using a simplified process to exchange undesirable cations in zeolite with lithium ions. The coin cell with Li-zeolite coated separator exhibits an average Coulombic efficiency of 99.89% and achieves a capacity retention rate of 78.3% after 500 cycles at 25 degrees C. From elevated temperature test, we find out that a lower amount of manganese is present on the cycled graphite electrode when Li-zeolite coated separator is used, suggesting less side reactions resulted from Mn. We propose that Li-zeolite can provide multiple functions to improve the cycle performance of manganese containing positive electrodes: (1) absorb trace water to reduce the formation of HF, (2) act as HF scavenger to mitigate its attack on the positive electrode, and (3) trap transition metal ions. Furthermore, the wettability and thermal stability of separator can be enhanced when Li-zeolite coating is applied.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available