4.7 Review

Exploring the Role of Cell Wall-Related Genes and Polysaccharides during Plant Development

Journal

PLANTS-BASEL
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants7020042

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [FT140100780, CE110001007]
  2. Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) [GRS10938]
  3. H2020-MSCA-RISE-2015 initiative SEXSEED
  4. Scottish Government via Rural Affairs Food and Environment Strategic Research (RESAS)
  5. Australian Research Council [FT140100780] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The majority of organs in plants are not established until after germination, when pluripotent stem cells in the growing apices give rise to daughter cells that proliferate and subsequently differentiate into new tissues and organ primordia. This remarkable capacity is not only restricted to the meristem, since maturing cells in many organs can also rapidly alter their identity depending on the cues they receive. One general feature of plant cell differentiation is a change in cell wall composition at the cell surface. Historically, this has been viewed as a downstream response to primary cues controlling differentiation, but a closer inspection of the wall suggests that it may play a much more active role. Specific polymers within the wall can act as substrates for modifications that impact receptor binding, signal mobility, and cell flexibility. Therefore, far from being a static barrier, the cell wall and its constituent polysaccharides can dictate signal transmission and perception, and directly contribute to a cell's capacity to differentiate. In this review, we re-visit the role of plant cell wall-related genes and polysaccharides during various stages of development, with a particular focus on how changes in cell wall machinery accompany the exit of cells from the stem cell niche.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available